BACK "CENSORSHIP?
At these times we are living, luckily with much publicity, a discussion that can radically change our daily lives and the scope of our rights. I refer to the Broadcasting Act that encourages the government, typing at your convenience, the right to communication and freedom of expression in Argentina.
I felt it necessary to review what rights citizens are at stake and how this law may affect us severely.
is argued that the freedom of thought, covers the possibility that each person in his inner life, develop their ideas as their own intimate convictions. Our interior is impenetrable, even to the state and we own our thoughts, elaborations, and silences. Meanwhile
freedom of expression protects the externalization of thinking that whatever the means employed. The oral and the written word, image, gesture and attitude are protected by that freedom.
The authors cited as a preferred freedom or fundamental, but as she generates, as an immediate consequence, the collapse of other rights (religious freedom, academic freedom, to teach and learn, right to information, freedom of press, freedom of printing, etc).
Our constitution prohibits advances further and that vile censorship mechanism, intended to quell the thoughts, demonstrations and dissent.
Ziulu rightly argues: ¨ By prohibiting prior censorship, the constituent sought to banish the old review process Previous publications by the government: This system has been, has long been replaced by more sophisticated instruments of censorship and more effective, such as the unequal distribution of official propaganda, manipulation in the distribution of paper violation of journalistic confidentiality, threats and intimidation, interference with oral, etc. ¨.
With the powers granted to the government for this bill I wonder who will be the censor now? or who will control when the state controller is the last link in the chain?
Everything is justified and Mills did when defining the formation of the state, but also warned us of freedom as a brake on the irrationality of Power.
¨ To prevent the weaker members of the community would be devoured by innumerable vultures, it was essential that a bird of prey more powerful than the rest will take care to contain the greed of others: but as the king of the vultures was no less willing to greed than their counterparts, it was necessary to guard, so constant to his beak and claws. So the patriots tended to impose limits to the power of rulers: this is reduced to what they meant by freedom ¨. According to Weber
power means the probability of imposing own will, within a social relationship, even against all resistance and whatever the basis of this possibility ¨.
Dear friends I think we are living in times of continuous and exhausting power resistors where a bulimic, fell in love over and pursues its own purposes at the expense of any medium. We are discussing
freedom, patterns and amounts, we are discussing about us, our rights and our future. My thinking is: ¨ begin to participate ¨. Deputy Provincial
Pro Union, Dr. Ramiro Gutierrez.
0 comments:
Post a Comment